Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: st: RE: predicting probabilities


From   Jeph Herrin <junk@spandrel.net>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: AW: st: RE: predicting probabilities
Date   Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:09:08 -0400


Of course. But this is not the answer to your rhetorical
question.



Martin Weiss wrote:
<>

So anything that is not dichotomous already is forced to be dichotomous by
applying this rule, and then estimation proceeds with a dichotomous
variable...



HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Jeph Herrin
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2009 15:35
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: Re: st: RE: predicting probabilities

In Stata, -logit- takes non dichotomous dependent
variables, treating any non-zero, non-missing value
as a 1.

Martin Weiss wrote:
Does logistic regression take anything other than a dichotomous dependent,
btw?




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index