Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: outreg2 stars and dprobit


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: AW: outreg2 stars and dprobit
Date   Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:54:16 +0200

<> 

-dprobit- has caused major confusion before, so it is probably a good thing that it has now joined the "deprecated" club in Stata 11. Still, when I run the example below, the agreement btw Stata output and -outreg2- is there. Can you give an example where it is not?


*************
vers 10.1

webuse lbw2, clear

probit low age lwt race2 /* 
 */ race3 smoke ptl ht ui, /* 
 */ nolog
 
dprobit low age lwt race2 /* 
 */ race3 smoke ptl ht ui, /* 
 */ nolog
 
outreg2 using myfile, /* 
 */ replace

seeout using "myfile.txt"
************* 



HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Emilia Garcia-Appendini
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2009 10:18
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: st: outreg2 stars and dprobit

Hi,

I have run a -dprobit- regression followed by an -outreg2- command. The significance stars reported in the output file with the default standard errors option at times do not coincide with p-values reported in the stata regression output. This does not happen with the -probit- command, nor with the -dprobit- using outreg2 and reporting p-values instead of standard errors... Has anybody else noticed this problem?


Emilia

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index