[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Poisson vs. Linear regression for comparing rates

From   Ashwin Ananthakrishnan <>
Subject   st: Poisson vs. Linear regression for comparing rates
Date   Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:56:16 -0700 (PDT)


I'm trying to do a state-level analysis looking at rates of a particular cancer and it's relationship to some state-level variables such as proportion uninsured in the state, racial composition of the state and some other state-level economic variables. 

However, I'm not sure if I should be using Poisson regression or Linear regression to assess the relationship between the rate of cancer (independent variable) and the dependent variables.

What determines which regression model is the best? 

Should I automatically start with Poisson regression, and use the goodness of fit test after that to see if that's the appropriate model (i.e. if gof p > 0.05). If so, should I do it after univariate analysis with each variable? 

If the rate of cancer is not normally distributed, should I log transform it and then use linear regression? 

Thanks in advance for your help.  


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index