[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: multiple weights per person in GEE? |

Date |
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:17:46 -0500 |

If SAS does it, it does not mean it is such a great idea. And propensity score matching people rarelly care about any other complications that may be arising from the complex data structure, in my experience. First, check out the FAQ: http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtweight.html which talks about the conceptual foundations for use of weights. Propensity score weights are neither frequency, variance, or sampling weights; they are more like kernel weights in non-parametric regression. At any rate, my understanding of GEE is that a contribution to the objective function is from the whole panel: you compute the residuals, then, for each panel, you compute the quadratic form with the residuals using the working correlation matrix, and then the whole result is multiplied by the weight and added to the total. How exactly would the different weights go into that quadratic form? SAS might have found some algorithmic implementation (e.g., multiply each residual by the square root of the weight before wrapping the residuals around the correlation matrix), but I would personally want to see a Biometrika paper that would justify this before I apply any such method. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ariel Linden<ariel.linden@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a question more directed at the Stata folks than to the listserve > per se. > > Is there a reason why xtgee does not allow different weights/person/wave? It > gives an error message stating "weight must be constant within personnumber" > > While I hate to invoke the phrase, "but SAS does it", I am forced to. There > is a growing body of literature in which the propensity score weighting > method is applied to longitudinal data. Thus, by it's very nature, weights > will differ within individuals over each wave. > > I recogize GLLAMM as an option, but it is not very user friendly and > inordinately slower than other models within this family. > > Consider this a plea for improvement.:-) > > Thanks > > Ariel > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: multiple weights per person in GEE?***From:*"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com>

**References**:**st: multiple weights per person in GEE?***From:*"Ariel Linden" <ariel.linden@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Customizing the -s2mono- scheme in Stata 9.2?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Average Partial Effects after reoprob** - Previous by thread:
**st: multiple weights per person in GEE?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: multiple weights per person in GEE?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |