Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: st: RE: wald tests with mfx


From   Rich Steinberg <rsteinbe@iupui.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: AW: st: RE: wald tests with mfx
Date   Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:34:53 -0400

No, that is not what I want. And I've read all the online help on postestimation tools, along with a few hours of archive search on mfx and tobit. What I want is the vce of the marginal effects at the mean of various subsamples of the data. I had thought, like you, that if two marginal effects are statistically different in the tobit evaluated at the mean of the full sample, the same would be true when evaluated for any subsample. But when I run mfx on various subsamples, the Z scores of each coefficient are sensitive to the subsample. More is going on than simply applying the McDonald and Moffitt decomposition to a different level of censorship when I run that mfx command. Maybe that is a bug, but my more sophisticated friend thinks that mfx at a subsample mean is computing correctly and I am misunderstanding how to apply it to subsamples. Thus my current query.

Martin, and anyone else who is curious, here is the research problem that generated this strategy. We are seeing whether the marginal propensity to make charitable donations differs with the source of income (or annuitized equivalent for wealth variables), among other things, testing the implicit assumption of economists that money is money and consumption behavior of individuals does not depend on where that money came from. So for example, we want to know if the marginal propensity to give out of welfare transfer payments equals that out of earned income, annuitized inheritance income, etc. A single tobit evaluation tells us whether the coefficients on these various income measures are equal around the mean of our full sample. But there are no observations where the respondent received welfare income and had the mean level of other income sources, so the comparison at the mean has no clear interpretation of the sort we want. In our base model, we therefore test for the equality of coefficients within each of 7 subsample means (defined by having positive levels of each of our 7 income variables). (We hope to have more advanced estimates accounting for unmeasured heterogeneity that makes a person receiving welfare different from a person receiving an inheritance, but we are not there yet). Maybe we should estimate the entire tobit separately for each subsample, but as some of the subsamples are small (particularly our main income source of interest, inheritances) we were hoping those regressions could be pooled because the slopes with respect to the latent dependent variable were not significantly different in the subsamples.

Martin Weiss wrote:
<>

You are more than welcome! I did not endorse your research strategy as I do
not think that what you are attempting is necessary, but on a technical
level, you can get your hands on the desired returned result in this
fashion.

Stata provides a full array of postestimation tools for every estimation
command, and this list is usually exhaustive. If you want the -vce- of the
original estimation, you can get it like this:

***
sysuse auto, clear
generate wgt=weight/1000
tobit mpg wgt gear_ratio, ll(17)
estat vce
***

HTH
Martin

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Rich Steinberg
Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2009 22:51
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: Re: st: RE: wald tests with mfx

Thanks for responding, and so quickly. Good answer, but I learned from following your advice that this reproduces only the standard errors, not the covariances I would need for a Wald test. I don't see an e( ) that saves the vce. And I can't use the vce from the original tobit because the sample is changing.

Martin Weiss wrote:
<>

" For the latter, I know from the Help file that mfx saves what I need as e(Xmfx_se_dydx), but I can't figure out how to see that."

***
sysuse auto, clear
generate wgt = weight/100
tobit mpg wgt len tu head, /*
*/ ll(17) ul(24)

mfx compute, /*
*/ predict(e(17,24))

mat l e(Xmfx_se_dydx)
mat A=  e(Xmfx_se_dydx)
matrix list A

di A[1,3]
***

HTH
Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Rich Steinberg
Sent: Montag, 13. Juli 2009 22:10
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: wald tests with mfx

As a relatively unsophisticated user, I have tried for a few hours and failed to solve the following problem. After running tobit, I want to test for the equality of marginal effects for the unconditional observable dependent variable. No problem with mfx or dtobit. But I don't want to evaluate these marginal effects test at the mean, median or zero of the full sample prior to testing. Instead, I want to use the estimates from the full sample, but evaluate the marginal effect at means of various subsamples. So I have, for example:

tobit totgiv $income $control, ll vce(cluster fid68)
mfx if welfare01>0, pred(ystar(0,.))

Now, I want to test for the equality of two elements of $income in this subsample. But everything I try works on the tobit coefficients, not the mfx output. So how do I retrieve this for a "test" command (ideally) or even display the vce from the mfx to do the test by hand? For the latter, I know from the Help file that mfx saves what I need as e(Xmfx_se_dydx), but I can't figure out how to see that. This should be easy, but stumped me.

Thanks everyone.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

--
Rich Steinberg
Department of Economics, 516 Cavanaugh Hall
IUPUI
Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140
317-278-7221

"Unanswered email since 1955"

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index