[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Richard Palmer-Jones <richard.palmerjones@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels) |

Date |
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:41:04 +0100 |

I see I should have looked at the decimal places.I can get the right labels by doing the approriate substr(). Obviously I need a more appriate formula for the CIs! On this occasion I want to draw CI graphs with the survey adjusted CIs., without having to go manual. RIchard On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Austin Nichols<austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: > Richard Palmer-Jones<richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>: > There are a variety of ways to loop over categories and collect > results, but note that the approach you give does not agree with the > results of -svy:mean- (check your CIs), and does not collect the > values of categorical variables (e.g. NE and E both become E). My > question stands--what do you want this for? The goal dictates the > preferred method. For example, if you wanted to write out a formatted > table, an easy way to go is to use -estout- e.g. > > use nhanes2, clear > la def smsa 1 "City" 2 "Noncity SMSA" 4 "NonSMSA" > la val smsa smsa > egen subpop=group(smsa region), label > svy: mean bpsystol, over(subpop) nohe noleg > qui ta subpop, gen(i_) label > qui svy: reg bpsystol i_*, nocons > eststo smsa > esttab smsa, nogap varw(25) la b(%9.4f) ci(%9.4f) nostar > > or to an MSWord file: > > esttab smsa using t.doc, rtf nogap varw(25) la b(%9.4f) ci(%9.4f) nostar > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Richard > Palmer-Jones<richard.palmerjones@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sorry, I was taking a short cut - yes I want the ses - my problem >> was/is to access the e(over_labels) which consist of two comonents >> separated by a space. >> >> So to add ses I can >> >> ..... >> mat ev = vecdiag(e(V))' >> mat eb = e(b)' >> mat en = e(_N)' >> mat evn = eb,ev,en >> >> drop _all >> svmat evn >> gen row = "" >> forval o = 1/`c(N)' { >> local r : label g `o' >> replace row = "`r'" in `o' >> } >> gen var1 = substr(row, 1, 2) >> gen var2 = substr(row, -1, 1) >> gen lb = evn1 - invttail(evn3-1,0.025) * (evn2^0.5 * sqrt(evn3) / sqrt(evn3)) >> gen ub = evn1 + invttail(evn3-1,0.025) * (evn2^0.5 * sqrt(evn3) / sqrt(evn3)) >> >> gives me the ses >> >> But I am disappointed I cannot captuer the over_labels in am ore >> elegant way, and was just thinking there must be a way to parse the >> e(over_labels) macro in a better way. but the spaces between "NE and >> "1`" were defeating me until I came upon the "local r : label >> labelname # " wheeze. >> >> So, expecting enlightenment >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Austin Nichols<austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Richard Palmer-Jones<richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I don't understand--if indeed you only want the weighted means and not >>> the SEs, then use -collapse- and get there in one line, and note that >>> pweights and aweights are equivalent if you do not need SEs. What do >>> you need this dataset of summary stats for, anyway? The goal dictates >>> the preferred method, in general. My point was just that the labels >>> (both numeric and string) for the -over- variable are easy to access. >>> >>> Also, it looks like in your original post you said "I want to compuile >>> the ereturned e(b) and e(v) results of a -mean var1, over(var2 var3, >>> nolabel)- into a usable form, such as rows in new variables or a >>> matrix, together with the relevatn values of var2 & var3" so a matrix >>> is what you asked for... >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Richard >>> Palmer-Jones<richard.palmerjones@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> and then extracting the two values gives me the result I wan - a file >>>> with the resulsts of svy: mean .. , over() >>>> >>>> | v1 row var1 var2 | >>>> |-------------------------------| >>>> 1. | 125.7034 NE 1 NE 1 | >>>> 2. | 127.8939 NE 2 NE 2 | >>>> 3. | 129.4605 NE 4 NE 4 | >>>> 4. | 126.8856 MW 1 MW 1 | >>>> 5. | 126.381 MW 2 MW 2 | >>>> +-------------------------------+ >>>> >>>> >>>> I am sure there are more elegant ways to do this, but I cannot get the >>>> more obvious ones to work for reasons I am sure are obvious to adpets. > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Richard Palmer-Jones <richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Richard Palmer-Jones <richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>

**st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Richard Palmer-Jones <richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>

**RE: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

**RE: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Richard Palmer-Jones <richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>

**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Richard Palmer-Jones <richard.palmerjones@gmail.com>

**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: RE: Useing e(over_labels)** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |