Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Heckman with selection specified as a multinomial logit


From   Tirthankar Chakravarty <tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Heckman with selection specified as a multinomial logit
Date   Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:39:06 +0100

<>
<>

For continuous outcomes & multinomial selection, this is probably what you want:
http://www.pse.ens.fr/gurgand/selmlog13.html

T

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Monica
Yanez-Pagans<myanezp2@illinois.edu> wrote:
> Dear Stata users:
>
> I am trying to address selectivity bias in the estimation of an earnings function when selection is specified as a multinomial logit model. It is in my understanding that there are three different main approaches in the literature to do so, namely the Lee (1983) approach, the Dubin and McFadden (1984) approach, and a semi-parametric approach by Dahl (2002). I am wondering if anyone knows of any routine in Stata that allows implementing any of such procedures.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Monica
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>



-- 
To every ω-consistent recursive class κ of formulae there correspond
recursive class signs r, such that neither v Gen r nor Neg(v Gen r)
belongs to Flg(κ) (where v is the free variable of r).

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index