[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: adoupdate question

From   "Nick Cox" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: adoupdate question
Date   Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:11:26 +0100

I don't think that's true at all. I've done this, Ben Jann does it a
lot, and I'm sure there are other examples. 

My main point, which may be at risk of being lost under a mass of
detail, is that I often find it practical to segregate and freeze old
versions. The defence for that is, largely, that it is practical and
time-saving. Once -foobar8- has been peeled off I almost never need to
think about it again. I make the users of Stata 8 (possibly up) suffer a
little insofar as if they stay on the old -foobar- and then use
-adoupdate- they may find their usable -foobar- program overwritten by
an unusable program. But they can fix that by installing -foobar8- and
editing their do files and scripts that used -foobar-. The example holds
"for any value of 8". 


Richard Williams

With Alan's approach, I suppose a wildly 
ambitious programmer could also support version 
control, although I am not aware of a single 
user-written program that does that.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index