Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: AW: what does constant implies in fixed effect


From   mukta mukherjee <muktabondhu@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: AW: what does constant implies in fixed effect
Date   Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:16:31 -0400

 thanks a lot.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Martin Weiss<martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> <>
>
> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtreg2.html
>
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von mukta mukherjee
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 19:40
> An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Betreff: st: what does constant implies in fixed effect
>
> Hi!
> 1) Could anybody tell me what does the constant implies in fixed
> effect result in Stata. Because in fixed effect regression the
> constant terms should ideally get deleted.
> 2) Further, I would like to get deviation of the dependent variable
> from its individual (id) mean. so i used the following command:
>
> xtreg depent variable , fe
>
> But when I checked the residual it is a constant for each group . Why
> is it so? and how to interpret the residual. Also how to get the
> desired deviation.
> Thanks
> Mukta
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index