Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: nested clusters with svy command


From   Matt Spittal <Matt.Spittal@cancervic.org.au>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: nested clusters with svy command
Date   Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:59:12 +1000

Gaby,

A very good explanation of of what's going on here is given in the following
Statalist post.

    http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-06/msg00074.html

-- Matt
matt.spittal@cancervic.org.au




On 25/6/09 6:05 PM, "Ana Gabriela Guerrero Serdan"
<ag_guerreroserdan@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> I am doing some regressions and need to correct my standard errors for any
> possible clustering effects (municipalities, districts).
> 
> Reading Austin's presentation  (http://repec.org/usug2007/crse.pdf), it says
> that I can use svy commands in stata. I have tried the following and I get:
> 
> svyset goverurban || clusternum
> Note: stage 1 is sampled with replacement; all further stages will be ignored
> 
>       pweight: <none>
>           VCE: linearized
>   Single unit: missing
>      Strata 1: <one>
>          SU 1: goverurban
>         FPC 1: <zero>
> 
> Which means Stata ignores the second clustering effects (clusternum:
> districts)? 
> 
> Has anyone had a different outcome? So it is not possible to correct for
> nested clusters? 
> 
> 
> thanks, 
> Gaby 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index