Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: computing expected values for GLM with nbreg


From   abelmore@purdue.edu
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: computing expected values for GLM with nbreg
Date   Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:20:50 -0400

Hello,

I am running a negative binomial model - because my data are time series I 
switched to running the model through the GLM command so I could control for 
autocorrelation and heterosk. w/ HAC variance estimates. I want to compute 
expected values to make the interpretation a little more tranparent. When using 
the nbreg command previously I used clarify to get expected values. Clarify 
won't run after GLM, and looking through STATA help I see no postestimation 
command for getting expected values. Does anyone know how I might go about 
getting expected values through STATA with this set up -- would I be better of 
doing hand calculations?

Thanks for any help,
Ashlie Delshad
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index