[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Can I Use Rate Ratios to Compare Two "Disease" Outcomes?

From   "Emily Putnam-Hornstein" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: Can I Use Rate Ratios to Compare Two "Disease" Outcomes?
Date   Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:06:10 -0700

I wish to make comparisons between injury death rates and rates of child
maltreatment. I have computed age-specific injury death rates per 100,000,
Rate Ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals using the Stata command "ir".
Similarly, I have computed maltreatment rates per 1,000, RR, and confidence
intervals for these same age and race groups (and during the same period). 

For example (white is the reference group):
	ir deaths black pop, by(agecat)
	ir subs black pop, by(agecat)

Now, I would like to compute a ratio of the maltreatment rate to the rate of
death for a given age/race group (I am exploring the all-cause injury death
rate as a proxy for child welfare service needs). In other words, I would
like to examine the association between maltreatment rates and death rates,
within race. To accomplish this, I have used the "iri" command, entering the
population count twice (since the same age/race population was exposed to
both maltreatment and death in a given year).

For example, having computed black to white RR for deaths and maltreatment
above, I now compute a RR of maltreatments to deaths for each race/age group
	black infants:
	iri subs deaths pop pop

Are there any obvious problems with this method from a statistical
standpoint? Can I consider the confidence intervals to be valid? Any other
suggestions for how I might compare these two rates? I've explored some
epidemiology text books, but haven't identified anything relevant. Any
thoughts/suggestions would be very welcome. 
Thank you.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index