Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: AW: combined Pearson and Spearman (listwise ) + LATEX


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: AW: combined Pearson and Spearman (listwise ) + LATEX
Date   Tue, 19 May 2009 13:37:27 +0100

Not quite your question, but -corrci- from the Stata Journal site
(-search- for exact location) supports confidence intervals for Pearson
correlations. 

Thinking is not uniform on this across statistical science, but you only
have to study a few correlations, sample sizes, and calculated P-values
to see that -- unless your sample size is absurdly small -- almost any
correlation qualifies as significant at conventional levels.  

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Katja Schulze

Thank you, Martin!

You got it, I've got Vista. But now it works perfectly fine after having
updated to 10.1.

Do you also know how to add p-values (best in parantheses) below each
correlation coefficient?

I could imagine 

qui spearman `varlist', pw stats(rho p) 

could help, but how do I combine the rho-/ and p-matrices? And I do not
find an option for corr similar to the "sig"-option of pwcorr. 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index