Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Re: multiple imputation and survival analysis


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: Re: multiple imputation and survival analysis
Date   Fri, 1 May 2009 20:02:49 +0200

<>

The example from the help file produces hazard ratios as default, and you have to request coefficients. I am having a hard time to believe that it behaves differently because of the imputation..

***
webuse kva, clear
stset failtime
stcox load bearings

//    Replay results, but show coefficients rather than hazard ratios
stcox, nohr
***


HTH
Martin
_______________________
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephanie L Kent" <s.l.kent59@csuohio.edu>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 7:34 PM
Subject: st: multiple imputation and survival analysis


Hi,
I'd like to run a cox regression in data declared survival after using
multiple imputation.

I ran the "ice" command then using the imputed data, the micombine command
followed by the stcox model.  However, this produced models with
coefficients rather than hazard rates.  Do you know how or if I can
interpret these, or how/can I get hazard rate coefficients? I tried adding
a ", hazard" after the command Stata told me the option was not allowed.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Stephanie


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index