Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: svy:tabulate: what to report - design-based test or the Uncorrected chi-square


From   Chao Yawo <Yawo1964@yahoo.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: svy:tabulate: what to report - design-based test or the Uncorrected chi-square
Date   Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:09:16 -0400

thanks for the encouragment
------------------------------------------------------------------



On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
> I promise that the Stata Journal would not make you choose.
>
> Otherwise, if you're that short of space, cut something else.
>
> Nick
> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
>
> Chao Yawo
>
> yeah, I was considering a situation where because of economy of space,
> one has to report only one of the statistic.  thanks - cy
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Why choose at all? Together both tell a story.
>>
>> Nick
>> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
>>
>> Chao Yawo
>>
>> svy: tabulate reports an "Uncorrected chi-square"
>> and "design-based" test, which according to the stata help "corrects
>> for the survey design with the second-order correction of Rao and
>> Scott (1984) and is converted into an F statistic.."
>>
>> in reporting the results of the chi-square, which of these should I
>> chose:  the uncorrected chi-square of the corrected design-based
>> version.
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index