[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: AW: Difference between -suest- and -sureg- |

Date |
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:54:04 -0400 |

Herve STOLOWY: I would use -suest- for your problem. -sureg- gives you more or less the same answer as two separate OLS regressions when both regressions have the same RHS variables, but it does allow you to test across equations. If that is all you want, and you think the OLS assumptions are justified, it may be preferable, I suppose. -suest- gives you the same point estimates as the separate regressions, even when RHS variables differ across equations, but will give you slightly different variance estimates--it also estimates additional covariance terms--and it has more flexibility (there is no vce or cluster option on -sureg- for example). Try e.g. sysuse auto, clear qui sureg (mpg weight=foreign length), dfk mat sureg=e(V) est sto sureg qui reg mpg foreign length est sto r1 qui reg weight foreign length est sto r2 qui suest r1 r2 mat suest=e(V) est sto suest esttab sureg r1 r2, unstack esttab sureg suest, eq(1:1, 2:3) mat li sureg mat li suest On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote: > Maybe this post http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-08/msg00238.html > and answers help answer your question... > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Herve STOLOWY > Gesendet: Montag, 27. April 2009 16:15 > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Betreff: st: Difference between -suest- and -sureg- > > Dear Statalisters: > > A few days ago, I asked a question about how to test the difference in the > growth rate of two variables. I received several interesting answers and > Austin Nichols suggested the use of -suest-. If I adapt his suggestion to my > problem, I have the following command lines: > > reg foreign_base time if time > 3 & time < 7 > est sto i > reg foreign_match time if time > 3 & time < 7 > est sto v > suest i v, cluster(company) > test [i_mean]time=[v_mean]time > > Reading more on -suest- and -test-, I discovered the command -sureg-. I > tried to adapt it to my problem: > > sureg (foreign_base time) (foreign_match time ) if time > 3 & time < 7 > test [foreign_base]time = [foreign_match]time > > It seems to me that the two procedures are very similar, although the > results of the chi2 are not exactly the same (but they are consistent). > > Could someone explain to me the difference between the two procedures with > regard to my problem? Is one "better" than the other (please forgive me in > advance if my question is heretical). If the explanation is too long, could > I find a useful reference? > > Best regards > > Herve Stolowy > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Difference between -suest- and -sureg-***From:*"Herve STOLOWY" <stolowy@hec.fr>

- Prev by Date:
**st: AW: Difference between -suest- and -sureg-** - Next by Date:
**st: comparing loglikelihoods of ols dummy regression model vs random** - Previous by thread:
**st: AW: Difference between -suest- and -sureg-** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Difference between -suest- and -sureg-** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |