[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Quang Nguyen <quangn@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: Re: Re: st: What wrong with this ML model command? |

Date |
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:23:59 -1000 |

Thank you very much Glenn for your great help. I appreciate it. The program now works nicely after I make some changes as you suggested. Many thanks! On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Glenn Goldsmith <glenn.goldsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Quang, > > These two lines: > >> - replace `yb0' = ( `y_bo')^(`alpha') if `y_b0'>=0 >> = replace __000014 = ( )^(__00000T) if __000018>=0 > > Tell you that the local macro `y_bo' in the first line is empty (hence the > empty parentheses when the macro is evaluated in the second line). > > I assume you mean `y_b0' instead. > > As an aside, you could just code > > generate double `yb0' = (`y_b0')^(`alpha') if `y_b0'>=0 > > instead of > > generate double `yb0' = . > replace `yb0' = (`y_b0')^(`alpha') if `y_b0'>=0 > > Same goes for `ya1'. > > HTH, > > Glenn. > > Quang Nguyen <quangn@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Glenn and Maarten. I appreciate it. > > Here is part of the "trace" that contains the error: > > - generate double `yb0' = . > = generate double __000014 = . > - replace `yb0' = ( `y_bo')^(`alpha') if `y_b0'>=0 > = replace __000014 = ( )^(__00000T) if __000018>=0 > invalid syntax > replace `yb1' = ( `y_b1')^(`alpha') if `y_b1'>=0 > > I double check the code and nothing seems wrong. Do you have any idea? > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- "My father gave me the greatest gift anyone could give another person, he believed in me." - Jim Valvano * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**RE: Re: Re: st: What wrong with this ML model command?***From:*"Glenn Goldsmith" <glenn.goldsmith@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Model in outdated time varying cox command with longitudinal data** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: adjusted Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon test** - Previous by thread:
**RE: Re: Re: st: What wrong with this ML model command?** - Next by thread:
**st: adjusted Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon test** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |