[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Glenn Goldsmith" <glenn.goldsmith@gmail.com> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: What wrong with this ML model command? |

Date |
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:43:56 +0100 |

Hi Quang, It looks like a problem with your MLkt0_1 function. You often get this sort of error if you try to use an undefined local macro as a name. Using -set trace on- before running the command should allow you to identify the problem. HTH, Glenn. Quang Nguyen <quangn@gmail.com> wrote: Dear All, I had a program called MLkt0_1 to estimate three parameters alpha, lamda, and gamma. However, as I rum the following command: ml model lf MLkt0_1 (alpha: choiceA p_a0 p_a1 p_b0 p_b1 y_a0 y_a1 y_b0 y_b1 =) (lamda:) (gamma:), cluster(id) maximize technique(nr) There's message saying that "," is not a valid name. Do you know what may cause this? Many thanks! * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: What wrong with this ML model command?***From:*Quang Nguyen <quangn@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: adjusted Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon test** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: RE: question from statalist** - Previous by thread:
**st: What wrong with this ML model command?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: What wrong with this ML model command?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |