# Re: st: IV estimation for probit models with binary endogenous variable...?

 From Kit Baum To statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject Re: st: IV estimation for probit models with binary endogenous variable...? Date Thu, 2 Apr 2009 07:40:12 -0400

```<>
Antoine said

If you are ready to assume joint normality, then -biprobit- should do
the trick:

/*------------------------------*/
clear
set obs 10000
set seed 987654321
drawnorm e1 e2, cov(1,0.5\0.5,1)
drawnorm x1 x2 z1 z2
g endog=(1+z1+z2+e1>0)
g y=(1+endog+x1+x2+e2>0)
probit y endog x1 x2 /*biased*/
biprobit (y= endog x1 x2) (endog=z1 z2)

```
I'm not so sure. Stata will allow you to estimate that model, but it calls it the "seemingly unrelated bivariate probit" model. That model is described in Greene, Econometric Analysis 6ed (p. 817), as analogous to SUR ("in the same spirit as the seemingly unrelated regression model"): that is, two equations in which there are nothing but exogenous explanatory variables. The way in which Antoine has written the model is one in which you surely could use cmp, as it is recursive (y depends on endog, but endog does not depend on y). But I'm not sure that the assumptions of the SUBP model are satisfied here.
```
```
Greene (p. 817) describes a model in which an endogenous regressor is binary as a 'treatment effects' model and suggests that it should be treated as a selection problem.
```
Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |   http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
```
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
```   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```