Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio


From   jjc.li@utoronto.ca
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio
Date   Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:59:18 -0400

I am quite sure it's the same 3 regions. Because I just input the 3 regions dataest. I will try to use-force-, then run it again.

Thank you.

Quoting Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>:


--- On Tue, 17/3/09, jjc.li@utoronto.ca  wrote:
The previous results is from the estimation of a "7
regions dataset".

Then I use almost the same command to do the estimation of
a "3  regions dataset". The only thing I change is that I
choose first 3 regions of the total 7 regions and also
modify the command that related to the dummy varible. This
time, it gives a negative value.

Are you sure both models A and E refer to the same 3 regions?

Did you specify the -force- option in -lrtest-?

--Maarten

-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------







*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/





*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index