Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Return r(111) this time


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Return r(111) this time
Date   Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:14:39 -0000

``lnpe' or `lne'' can not be legal. As in ordinary language, single quotes must be in matching pairs. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

jjc.li@utoronto.ca

First, I corrected all the typo.

Then I changed constant item 5 to a0 in the first equation. I setted  
constant item a0 as a strating value 5 in my previous codes, because  
they did so in the example. Now I decide to scalar a new coef. a0. Is  
that ok? Or I need to set the constant item at other starting value?

Second, I typed -set trace on- before running the stuff. Here's the  
error record:


}
-------------------------------------------------------------- end  
nlsurwellbehav	---
- }
- if _rc {
- di as error "nlsur`eqn' returned " _rc
= di as error "nlsurwellbehav returned " _rc
nlsurwellbehav returned 111
- di as error "verify that nlsur`eqn' is a function evaluator program"
= di as error "verify that nlsurwellbehav is a function evaluator program"
verify that nlsurwellbehav is a function evaluator program
- exit _rc
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------- end  
nlsur.Estimate	---
end nlsur	---
r(111);

I am thinking there maybe another kind of errors in my codes. Say  
there's two items in my equation:   a*lne   and   b*lne*lne. I think I  
should define them as:

replace `lnc'=`a'*`lne'+`b'*``lnpe'*`lne''

In my previous codes I defined them as:

`lnc'=`a'*`lne'+`b'*`lnpe'*`lne'

Does it cause the r(111)?


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index