[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
jverkuilen <jverkuilen@gc.cuny.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>, <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>, Multilevel modelling discussion list <multilevel@jiscmail.ac.uk> |

Subject |
RE: st: IRT with GLLAMM |

Date |
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:50:26 -0500 |

Stas, Sounds like an empirical unidentification problem to me, just as you say, and my advice is exactly the same as Joseph Coveney's: Run the Rasch model, which can be done simply as a random intercept logistic regression in -xtlogit-, -xtmelogit- or -clogit- (the latter for conditional ML favored by many Rasch-ies). If you can figure out how to run the 2PL in -xtmelogit- that would be great I messed around a little on that but don't know how to specify the requisite bilinear form in terms of the random effects covariance matrices. For your data, you may need to impose a prior. This can often be done by adding some pseudo-observations to your dataset that fit the model towards which you want to shrink. Having read the original papers of Bock et al on the estimation, the slope parameter has more need for a prior than the location (unsurprisingly). (All this is summarized in F Baker and SH Kim, 2002, Item Response Theory Estimation, CRC Press.) JV -----Original Message----- From: "Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu; "Multilevel modelling discussion list" <multilevel@jiscmail.ac.uk> Sent: 3/4/2009 6:46 PM Subject: st: IRT with GLLAMM My data set consists of students (CourseID variable), their test questions (Question) and 0/1 indicator of whether they've answered the question correctly. The data are in the long form appropriate for GLLAMM. I am modeling the questions as fixed/parameters of the model, and students as random factors. Here's what I have: * generate dummy variables for questions xi i.Question, noomit * specify the equation for the random factor: the dummy variables from the previous command eq diff : _IQ* * variance of the random factor identification constr 55 [Cou1_1]_IQuestion_4 == 1 * call to gllamm: 2-parameter IRT gllamm Correct _IQ* , fam( bin ) link( logit ) i( CourseID ) eq( diff ) nocons constr(55) I am specifying -nocons- so that each question has its own intercept (sensitivity times difficulty, in IRT terms), and the factor loadings from -eq()- option should give me the sensitivity. -gllamm-, however, has trouble converging. Does it have to do with empirical underidentification? Do I need to search for a better identifying variable? Question 4 above was the first on the list that had any variability; everybody answered the first three questions. It is probably not a terrific question to give identification, too: only a couple people missed it. My sample sizes are not terrific, either: I have about 40 students and about 30 questions. And there are lots of easy questions that were missed by one or two or three students only. If I have only one student who missed a question, then I probably won't be able to identify two parameters for that question, right? Finally, since we are talking about random effects logit in Stata, is there any way to run this with -xtmelogit-? It should be faster, at least. -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: IRT with GLLAMM***From:*Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: AW: Nº of Observations in Probit regressions** - Next by Date:
**st: memory problem** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: IRT with GLLAMM** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: IRT with GLLAMM** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |