[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Federico Belotti <f.belotti@econometrics.it> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: mfx after xtmelogit |

Date |
Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:04:52 +0100 |

Roberto, tks for your reply. I expected what you say but I was deceived by the error type -r(459)- regards F -- Federico Belotti Faculty of Economics Department of Financial and Quantitative Economics Tor Vergata University tel: +39 06 7259 5624 e-mail: federico.belotti@uniroma2.it url: http://www.econometrics.it/profile.htm Roberto G. Gutierrez, StataCorp ha scritto:

Federico Belotti <f.belotti@econometrics.it> writes:I've a problem with mfx after xtmelogit. The error I get is the following:data have changed since estimation r(459);You can try using the following commands and observe the error alone:webuse bangladesh xtmelogit c_use urban age child* || district: urban mfx, eyex predict(mu)Federico has encountered a bug in -mfx- after -xtmelogit-, and we will fix this bug in a future ado update. Unforunately, the resolution of this bug ismerely trading one error message for another one.The error message arises because the -mu- prediction includes estimated random effects, which are not estimated as part of the model but obtained postestimation. Estimated random effects are stochastic quantities similar to residuals. Since they are not estimated as model coefficients, their inclusion in -mfx- calculations is dubious since any error in estimation is not reflected in the standard errors for the marginal effects. As such, after the bug is fixed Federico will instead encounter . mfx, eyex predict(mu) predict() expression mu unsuitable for marginal-effect calculation r(119); but, more importantly, he will then have the option of specifying -force- to force the calculation to go through. -force- comes at a price however; standard errors will not be valid. See -help mfx- for more details about the -force- option. Finally, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> points out that this does not occur with -xtmixed-. That is because the default prediction for -xtmixed- does not include any random effects. --Bobby rgutierrez@stata.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: mfx after xtmelogit***From:*rgutierrez@stata.com (Roberto G. Gutierrez, StataCorp)

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: mfx after xtmelogit** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: AW: 'cnreg' command to fit Censored-normal regression model** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: mfx after xtmelogit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: AW: 'cnreg' command to fit Censored-normal regression model** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |