[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation |

Date |
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:48:02 +0100 |

<>

*********** clear* set obs 10000 g firstdice=cond(runiform()<`=1/6', 1,4) prop first *********** HTH Martin _______________________

To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:43 AM Subject: Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation

Thanks Martin. What if the dice were non-transitive? Is that where -simulate- comes into play in order to generate the roll outcomes? Say something like: Dice 1: 1, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 so 4 is 5/6 and 1 is 1/6 RickOn Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>wrote:<>Normally, one would use -simulate- but this is more easily accomplishedas********* clear* set obs 10000 g firstdice=1+int(6*runiform()) g seconddice=1+int(6*runiform()) g sumofdice=firstdice+seconddice *let`s see whether CIs conform to our idea of unbiased dice prop sum ********** where you can edit the obs to the # of replications you want... HTH Martin _______________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Bishop" <wbishopco@gmail.com> To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:08 AM Subject: st: basic monte carlo simulationTrying to create a monte carlo simulation for throwing a pair of dice with 6-sides, numbered 1-6 (each side equally likely, thus 1/6). So there are 36 combinations of dice rolls and the sum will always be between 2 (1 and 1) and 12 (6 and 6). With a large number of simulations, we should get the probabilities of: 2: 1/36 = 0.02778 3: 2/36 = 0.05556 4: 3/36 = 0.08333 5: 4/36 = 0.11111 6: 5/36 = 0.13889 7: 6/36 = 0.16667 8: 5/36 = 0.13889 9: 4/36 = 0.11111 10: 3/36 = 0.08333 11: 2/36 = 0.05556 12: 1/36 = 0.02778 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation***From:*William Bishop <wbishopco@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: basic monte carlo simulation***From:*William Bishop <wbishopco@gmail.com>

**st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation***From:*William Bishop <wbishopco@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Re: Basic ado question** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Re: basic monte carlo simulation** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |