[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: Quantile regression with stata |

Date |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:51:04 -0000 |

Some further comments embedded below. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Tomas M I am using quantile regression to model the 50th percentile for my data. Unfortunately, the resources are limited on qreg when comparing to the literature available for traditional regression models. Questions: 1. I am mainly focused on the 50th percentile. But, if I wanted to compare 25th and 75th models (using the sreg with q(0.25 0.50 0.75) option), I am wondering if it is better to use the same set of predictors for each percentile, or if I should use a different set of predictors for each percentile? I wonder about this since each percentile may have a different set of significant predictors (for example, age may be significant for the 50th percentile, but not significant for the 25th percentile). Thus, is it better to compare models for 25th 50th and 75th percentiles using the best fitted model with all relevant significant predictors? >>> This is general modelling strategy and not specific to -qreg-. If you were say a graduate student of mine I'd personally rather see the same set of predictors being used in all models to be compared. Otherwise it's a matter of speculation how predictors left out of a model would have performed if included. I don't see that a model need include only predictors individually declared significant: that's putting more reliance on the machinery than is deserved. However, I would have no objection to also seeing slimmed down models. Other styles and tastes prevail too. 2. My other question pertains to interpretation of coefficients. When I run a model with certain predictors, sometimes I get a very small coefficient (i.e. 5e-15). How do I interpret this, and what does this mean? I do notice that this disappears once I collapse the categories for the predictor. >>> As above. It means as much or as little as it says. Without further evidence, it looks small, but all depends on what the units of measurement are and on looking at t-statistics as well and on considering what else in the model. If some categorical variable is represented by a bunch of indicators there is a very good case for keeping them all even if some aren't significant. 3. What tools are available to assess goodness of fit for my qreg model? I have read through the qreg postestimation commands for stata, and it seems that linktest, and predict would be my only options (i.e. plots of residuals versus fitted values are available). I have also looked through the UCLA regression with stata web book section on quantile regression, and it also states that there are limited postestimation commands available. >>> That is part illusion. You need not be restricted to canned commands. Indeed if you can get residuals and fitted you can get many other things too. Note that the -modeldiag- package (-search- for locations) includes several graphical commands that both make sense and work after -qreg-. 4. This final question relates to question 3. What would be the best method for variable selection for my final model? Still would be backwards elimination? How would I do this in stata, given the limited availability of post estimation commmands? Just start with all variables in my model, then eliminate ones with p-value greater than 0.05 (or add ones with p-value less than 0.05 if I were to add stepwise procedures too)? >>> The usual meta-comment is now that you won't get much support for any flavour of stepwise on this list. Search the list archives for "stepwise" and "Frank Harrell" for more. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: RE: Quantile regression with stata***From:*Tomas M <anon556656@live.ca>

**Re: st: RE: Quantile regression with stata***From:*Scott Merryman <scott.merryman@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Quantile regression with stata***From:*Tomas M <anon556656@live.ca>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: Weighted Least Squares - wls0** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: AW: Weighted Least Squares - wls0** - Previous by thread:
**st: R: Quantile regression with stata** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Quantile regression with stata** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |