RE: st: Jackknifing on Stata

 From "Nick Cox" To Subject RE: st: Jackknifing on Stata Date Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:37:13 -0000

```My understanding of jackknifing is that it is virtually _defined_ as
leaving each value
out in turn and combining all the results to see what that indicates
variability. It may be that you want some other cross-validation
procedure,
and well and good, but Stata's jackknifing procedures will not I think
provide it.

Nick
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

Shahrul Mt-Isa

Many thanks for the reply JV. I feel this could work. My understanding
of
jackknifing is it works from dependent random groups technique. Creating
a
dummy cluster would be a good way to start. I will double check the
literature to make sure this does yield something meaningful.

From: jverkuilen <jverkuilen@gc.cuny.edu>

I am not entirely sure what you want to do but you might want to
consider
jackknifing by a cluster variable. This is usually done in the context
of
jackknifing by subjects in a repeated measures context, where you throw
out
all observations within a given subject. But you could make an
artificial
cluster variable by generating a new variable that has fewer values than
the
number of subjects and is unrelated to any variable in the study. Then
cluster according to that.

I would be wary doing this actually converges to something meaningful,
though---check the literature. Also recall that jackknifing is only
appropriate when the statistic in question is continuously dependent on
the
data.

"Shahrul Mt-Isa" <shahrul_mtisa@hotmail.com>

I am trying to do a jackknife on a large dataset. Stata's -jackknife-
command and -,vce(jackknife)- deal with this I understand. However, it
is
very time consuming as this assumes straightaway that I want number of
groups A=n number of patients. Is there a way for me to choose A, for
example A=2 instead to make computation less intensive?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```