[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
AW: st: Re: estout and xtlogit |

Date |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:01:22 +0100 |

<> The manual is a little terse on this point. I got my info re -nlocm- from http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-06/msg00389.html It seems not many questions have been asked with respect to this issue, either. I do find it weird that the se for rho is not returned, as it is (probably) a prominent ingredient to the LR test at the bottom of -xtlogit- output... HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Ben Jann Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 10:55 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: Re: st: Re: estout and xtlogit To see a list of the returned results type . ereturn list after running xtlogit. I seems xtlogit does not return the SEs of rho and sigma_u. You'd have to compute them yourself and add them to the results before being able to tabulate them. For example, the SE of sigma_u can be computed as follows: . webuse union, clear . xtlogit union age grade not_smsa south southXt . estadd scalar se_sigma_u = [lnsig2u]_se[_cons] * exp([lnsig2u]_b[_cons]/2)/2 . esttab, sca(rho sigma_u se_sigma_u) Don't ask me about the SE of rho. Maybe check the manual. ben On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Hilde Karlsen <Hilde.Karlsen@hio.no> wrote: > Thank you so much; it worked! However, it would be great if also standard > errors for rho and sigma_u could be presented in this table. I tried this > command: > > esttab, sca(rho sigma_u) se brackets > > ...but it leaves me with se only for B's and lnsig2u, - not for rho and > sigma_u. Any suggestions? > > Regards, > Hilde > > > On 10.02.2009 19:55, Martin Weiss wrote: >> >> <> >> >> ******* >> webuse union, clear >> xtlogit union age grade not_smsa south southXt >> esttab, sca(rho sigma_u) >> ******* >> >> HTH >> Martin >> _______________________ >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hilde Karlsen" <Hilde.Karlsen@hio.no> >> To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:28 PM >> Subject: st: estout and xtlogit >> >> >>> Hi, all! >>> >>> I could need some help regarding the estout command for xtlogit, and I >>> would really appreciate any suggestions on this issue. I have estimated a >>> multilevel model using xtlogit, and as I would like to have the results more >>> neatly presented, I used the estout-command. However, for some reason, >>> estimates and standard errors for sigma_u and rho are not present in the >>> estout-output (only for the /lnsig2u) >>> >>> My question is therefore: how can I include estimates for sigma_u and rho >>> in the estout-table? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Hilde Karlsen >>> >>> >>> >>> I don't know if this is helpful, but here is my estout-syntax: >>> >>> estout using reging2.txt, eqlab("" "/lnsig2u ln of variance sigma_u " >>> "sigma_u L2 BS-variance" "rho Intraclass corr", none) replace style(fixed) >>> prehead("Model I: The probability of leaving nursing") >>> posthead("------------------------------------------------------------------ -") >>> cells("b(fmt(%9.3f) star label(Coef)) se(fmt(%9.3f) label (Std Err))") label >>> varwidth(30) varlabels(_cons "Constant") >>> prefoot("------------------------------------------------------------------- -") >>> stats(N, fmt(%9.0g)) >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> >> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > -- > > Hilde Karlsen > Høgskolen i Oslo > sg29/SG500 > 22 45 27 47 > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: AW: st: Re: estout and xtlogit***From:*Hilde Karlsen <Hilde.Karlsen@hio.no>

**References**:**st: estout and xtlogit***From:*Hilde Karlsen <Hilde.Karlsen@hio.no>

**st: Re: estout and xtlogit***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: Re: estout and xtlogit***From:*Hilde Karlsen <Hilde.Karlsen@hio.no>

**Re: st: Re: estout and xtlogit***From:*Ben Jann <ben.jann@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: estout and xtlogit** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Non-parametric tests for survey data? (e.g., Kruskal-Wallace)** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Re: estout and xtlogit** - Next by thread:
**Re: AW: st: Re: estout and xtlogit** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |