[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: R: interpretting log transformed co-efficients |

Date |
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:04:06 +0100 |

Ashwin wrote: <Without log transformation, if I get a linear regression co-efficient of 0.6, I can say that females have a 0.6 days longer stay. But if I use log (length of stay) as the outcome and get a co-efficient 0.2 for the same linear regression model, how do I interpret this?> Your thread seems to refer to a log-linear model, where only the dependent variable (i.e., Y) is log-transformed. In a log-linear model, a unit-change in the independent variable X (i.e., DeltaX=1)is associated with a 100*Beta% change in Y. Hence, a coefficient = 0.2 in your log-linear model means that the length of stay for females increases by [(0.2*100)%]=20% for each additional unit of X. HTH and Kind Regards, Carlo -----Messaggio originale----- Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Ashwin Ananthakrishnan Inviato: domenica 8 febbraio 2009 17.35 A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Oggetto: st: interpretting log transformed co-efficients Hi, I'm having some trouble interpretting the linear regression co-efficients for log transformed variables. I have outcomes (such as length of stay or costs) that are not normally distributed, so I'm including the log transformed (now normal) variables as the outcome measures in linear regression models. But I'm not really sure how to interpret the resulting co-efficients. Do they represent a % change in outcome for a defined change in a predictor variable? Just for example, suppose I'm modelling length of stay against gender (male 0 female 1). Without log transformation, if I get a linear regression co-efficient of 0.6, I can say that females have a 0.6 days longer stay. But if I use log (length of stay) as the outcome and get a co-efficient 0.2 for the same linear regression model, how do I interpret this? Thanks. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: interpretting log transformed co-efficients***From:*Ashwin Ananthakrishnan <ashwinna@yahoo.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: re: interpretting log transformed co-efficients** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: FWD: poisson regression on aggrgregated data** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: interpretting log transformed co-efficients** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: interpretting log transformed co-efficients** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |