[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# Re: st: Marginal effect after -clogit- and -xtlogit-

 From "Supnithadnaporn, Anupit" To statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject Re: st: Marginal effect after -clogit- and -xtlogit- Date Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:00:24 -0500 (EST)

```Yes, this helps! Thanks Maarten and Steven.

Anupit

----- "Steven Samuels" <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Maarten is correct: -predict(pu0)- gives the predicted probability
> when the intercept is zero.  However, zero may not be a plausible
> value.  For example: consider an unconditional model Y= logit(P) = a
>
> + ln(2)X, corresponding to OR = 2.0, for a one-unit increase in X.
> If the likely range of probabilities is 0.01 to 0.30, the
> corresponding range of Y is about -4.60 to -0.85.  If X > -1, then a
>
> = 0 is not possible.
>
> -Steve
> On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Maarten buis wrote:
>
> >
> > --- On Fri, 6/2/09, Supnithadnaporn, Anupit wrote:
> >> I analyze the data using both -clogit- and -xtlogit fe-
> >> commands. I would like to get the marginal effect of each
> >> independent variables in the model. However, -mfx- command
> >> does not work after both -clogit- and -xtlogit fe-, giving
> >> the error
> >>
> >> predict() expression  unsuitable for marginal effect
> >> calculation
> >> r(119);
> >>
> >> Would anyone please suggest me how to get the marginal
> >> effect after running -clogit- and -xtlogit fe-?
> >
> > -mfx, predict(pu0)-
> >
> >>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```

 © Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index