[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: AW: Interpretation of log transformed variables in logistic regression? |

Date |
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:33:11 +0100 |

<> "If I back transform this I get 1.68. This does not seem right, as a $1 increase in income would raise the odds of giving birth in a given year by 68%. This would mean $1,000 raise would increase the odds by 0.68*1000 or a 680% increase in the odds of giving birth." Quite apart from the log transformation prob, careful with those marginal effects. "Marginal" means for a small change so you cannot extrapolate that to a huge increase like your 1000 bucks... Also, -mfx- stresses the fact that the impact will be different depending on the value the covariates take on. As As default, the mean is assumed but you can ask for other evaluation points... HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Jason Davis Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2009 16:19 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: Interpretation of log transformed variables in logistic regression? I can use some help with this one. I have run a multivariate logistical regression with log transformed continuous variables, non-transformed continous variables, and some categorical variables. The DV is birth outcome in a given year (yes/no) and the IV of interest is income (log transformed). The results are in odds ratios. My confusion is how do I interpret the odds ratio of the log transformed continous variable. Specifically, the odds ratio of log income is 5.4. If I back transform this I get 1.68. This does not seem right, as a $1 increase in income would raise the odds of giving birth in a given year by 68%. This would mean $1,000 raise would increase the odds by 0.68*1000 or a 680% increase in the odds of giving birth. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Jason * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Interpretation of log transformed variables in logistic regression?***From:*Jason Davis <jason_davis@umail.ucsb.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: Bug in -use- or -if- ?** - Next by Date:
**st: round () if** - Previous by thread:
**st: Interpretation of log transformed variables in logistic regression?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Interpretation of log transformed variables in logistic regression?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |