[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Hatched bars, again
Fred Wolfe <email@example.com>
Re: st: RE: Hatched bars, again
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:56:35 -0600
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Nick Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I am not clear on the connection here.
The connection ... Although I mostly agree with Nick, the point of my
email was to provide some additional evidence that at least some
journals editors want "hatched bars."
A second, perhaps hidden, point was that this journal doesn't like
grey borders. So that perhaps Stata might want to consider adding a
default non-grey bordered scheme.
As for me, I can modify the scheme myself or edit it in the graph
editor... and I was able to convince the copy editor on the telephone
that the graph was quite readable with hatching.
> Fred reports an exchange with an editor about the rendering of various
> greys in a diagram in a paper. The diagram shows three box plots.
> Fred also used the title "hatched bars", which gave Sergiy a good
> opportunity to remind us of his implementation of area shadings.
> Does Fred want to be able to fill the boxes of his box plots?
> I've always found informative text (which could be numeric) the simplest
> way to distinguish different box plots. That applies where the plots are
> for distinct groups, variables or combinations.
> Incidentally, although grey requires care, I've had no problems
> publishing Stata-produced plots as diagrams in journals in my part of
> Fred Wolfe
> Although this subject has been aired before, I though this letter from
> a journal copy editor to me might put the issues practically. I sent a
> paired -graph box - with three shades of grey using scheme(s2mono).
> Not one should worry, as I will fix it with the editor, but the letter
> is interesting.
> "Dr. Wolfe,
> With respect, the artwork sent for this article does not meet minimum
> standards for print reproduction <snip> ... you will note the fine
> lines and details of the text and art are blurred and turning 'grey'
> or disappearing. And complicating the problem, there's a frame of grey
> shading all around the 2 graphs (an artefact from the original slide)
> that will show up in print as a distracting mess of shadow.
> As a general guideline, artwork intended for publication should be
> prepared in black and white only, with no grey-colored shading or
> lines, because material in grey cannot be printed clearly with good
> contrast. Where a different 'color' is needed to differentiate data
> or columns, cross-hatching effects in black and white are useful.
> As well, for best quality reproduction, it is best if charts and
> graphs are sent to us in the original program in which they were
> created (such as MicroSoft Word or Excel), not as "image scans" in
> MicroSoft Document format. When an image is scanned, it inevitably
> loses some sharpness of detail. But with artwork in the original
> program we are sometimes able to make adjustments for clarity of
> The department of publications at one of the authors' institutions
> may be able to assist in preparation of good quality artwork that
> communicates your data effectively.
> Is it possible that better quality artwork could be prepared somehow?"
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases
NDB Office +1 316 263 2125 Ext 0
Research Office +1 316 686 9195
* For searches and help try: