Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Simulating multilevel data in Stata


From   "James Shaw" <shawjw@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: Simulating multilevel data in Stata
Date   Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:55:10 -0600

Dear Statalist members,

I want to perform a simulation to show the inconsistency of the OLS
and random effects estimators when one of the regressors is correlated
with the unit-specific error component.  The specifics of the
simulation are as follows;

Y[i,t] (the outcome to be modeled) = b0 + b1*X1[i,t] + b2*X2[i,t] +
u[i] + e[i,t]

i = 1,...,500 indexes subjects
t = 1,...,3 indexes time (repeated observations on subjects)

X1 and X2 are normally distributed random variables with arbitrary
means and variances
u is a normally distributed subject-specific error component with mean
of 0 and arbitrary variance
e is a normally distributed random error component with mean of 0 and
arbitrary variance

corr(X1,X2) = 0.5
corr(X1,u) = 0.3
corr(X2,u) = 0.0
corr(X1,e) = corr(X2,e) = corr(u,e) = 0.0

b0, b1, and b2 are parameters to be specified in the simulation


I have been unable to identify a method that will ensure that
corr(X1,u) equals the desired value.  I tried the following method in
which u was generated separately from X1 and X2 and cholesky
decomposition was applied to generate transformations of the three
random variables that would exhibit the desired correlations.
However, this yielded a non-zero correlation between X2 and u.

Method 1
***
drop _all
set obs 500
gen n = _n
gen u=invnorm(uniform())
expand 3
sort n
gen n2 = _n
gen t= (n2 - (n-1)*3)
drawnorm x1 x2 e
sort n
mkmat x1 x2 u e, matrix(X)
mat c =(1, .5, .3, 0 \ .5, 1, 0, 0 \ .3, 0, 1, 0 \ 0, 0, 0, 1)
mat X2 = X*cholesky(c)
***

A method that yielded somewhat better results involved generating X1,
X2, u, and e with a pre-specified correlation matrix and then
collapsing u so that it varied by subject only.  This provided the
correct values for corr(X1,X2) and corr(X2,u) but attenuated the
correlation between X1 and u.  I presume that I could simply specify a
higher value for corr(X1,u) when generating the variables so that the
desired value would be achieved after u is collapsed.  However, this
would not be the most elegant solution.

Method 2
***
drop _all
set obs 500
mat c =(1, .5, .3, 0 \ .5, 1, 0, 0 \ .3, 0, 1, 0 \ 0, 0, 0, 1)
gen n = _n
expand 3
sort n
gen n2 = _n
gen t= (n2 - (n-1)*3)
drawnorm x1 x2 u e, corr(c)
sort n
by n: egen u2 = mean(u)
***

Any suggestions or references would be appreciated.

Regards,

Jim


James W. Shaw, Ph.D., Pharm.D., M.P.H.
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacy Administration
College of Pharmacy
University of Illinois at Chicago
833 South Wood Street, M/C 871, Room 252
Chicago, IL 60612
Tel.: 312-355-5666
Fax: 312-996-0868
Mobile Tel.: 215-852-3045
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index