Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: binary dependent variable


From   "Nirina F" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: binary dependent variable
Date   Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:31:51 -0500

Sorry, here it is:

Using Heteroscedasticity to Estimate the Returns to Education
V HOGAN, R RIGOBON - NBER Working Paper, 2002 -

NIrina

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> Line for the server...
>
> First of all, provide proper citations for your "Hogan and Rigobon".
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nirina F
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 9:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: binary dependent variable
>
> Hello,
>
> I have the following regression: y=ax1+ax2+e
> My dependent variable y is a binary choice variable and x1, my
> endogenous variable is continuous. x2 represents the rest of my
> control variables.
>
>  I would like to use the identification through heteroskedasticity
> like in Hogan and Rigobon but I don't know if having y as binary and
> therefore having to use LPM or Probit make me having a
> heteroskedasticity problem anyway.
> Does anyone know where does this heteroskedasticity of Probit come
> from? could you indicate anything in the literature?
> Thank you,
> Nirina
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index