[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Mak, Timothy" <timothy.mak07@imperial.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: graphing problem |

Date |
Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:18:28 -0000 |

Hi Martin, Thanks for the article. However, as the article says, Stata determines the minimum range of the graph according to the range of the data. It remains impossible to set the range of the graph to be smaller than that of the data. Tim -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss Sent: 05 December 2008 15:17 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: graphing problem Line for the server... Try http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=gr0019 HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Mak, Timothy Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 4:15 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: graphing problem Hi Statalist, I'm joining the list again after a period of absence. For some reason, I don't seem to be able to send directly to statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, but if I reply to a post, then it seems to get there. My original message was as follows: Hi Statalist, Is there any reason why Stata won't let you draw a graph whose y-axis' range is less than the actual range of the data? Is there a way to get round this? The motivation comes from doing a graph where there is one group which has a articularly large y value. If I graph it with the other groups, then all the other groups will be very small, and their relative heights not very distinguishable. If I can focus on the other groups and let the outlying group 'goes off the scale', that's clearly quite a good device to have. In fact, the problem can't be overcome even if I artificially set the outlying y value to the maximum of the y range, because the top will look different, particularly when I want to graph error intervals. Thanks for your help. Tim * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: RE: RE: graphing problem***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: RE: graphing problem***From:*"Scott Merryman" <scott.merryman@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Maximum likelihood simulation***From:*"Katia Bobulova" <katia.bobulova@googlemail.com>

**st: graphing problem***From:*"Mak, Timothy" <timothy.mak07@imperial.ac.uk>

**st: RE: graphing problem***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**st: AIC/BIC and "comparison of standardized beta coefficients"** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: RE: graphing problem** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: graphing problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: RE: graphing problem** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |