[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Cindy Gao <cindy.gao@ymail.com> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: ranking with weights |

Date |
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:54:58 +0000 (GMT) |

Hello I am trying to find a way to rank weighted data (since the egen function -rank- does not work with weights). A simple way would be order the data in terms of variable that I have interest in (monthly expenditure) and then create a new variable like -g rank1=sum(weight)-. But, there is problem. Some of my observations are "tied" as they have the same level of expenditure. Using the simple method I mention means that some observations are ranked above others even though they have same level of expenditure. This is a problem as the weights are large so you find that 2 observations are ranked with bug gap in between even though same level of expenditure. It is even bigger problem because the weights might be correlated with some other variables I am interested in (like region, since some regions are less sampled than other). I also try multiplying the expenditure ranking by the weight, but this gives wrong results (for example they do not add up to weighted total). Can anyone help? In other words, I would like for all observations with same expenditure to have same rank, which I assume would be some average of all the weighted observations having that same expenditure. I include a sample dataset below: expenditure weighting rank rank1 weighted_rank 10 341 1 341 341 12 1065 2.5 1406 ??? 12 98 2.5 1504 15 254 4 1758 ....... thanks, Cindy * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: ranking with weights***From:*Steven Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: converting many rows into one** - Next by Date:
**st: Proper usage of Macros stored in summarize** - Previous by thread:
**st: Interpretation of Log Transformed Independent Variables in Ordered Logit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: ranking with weights** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |