Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: RE: ret list of STATA10


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: RE: ret list of STATA10
Date   Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:31:58 -0000

To strengthen Martin's point: 

This question is at best very difficult to answer without knowing 

1. Which version of -metan- you are using. Show the results of -which
metan-. 

2. What you typed, precisely. 

3. What you mean by "usually provided by Stata 9.2". I can't see that
has any meaning in itself. 

What you are seeing are basically what might be expected after a
raphics command. I can't say which. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Martin Weiss

What has changed? Have you switched to Stata 10 or updated -metan- or
both?
Try to formulate your question in terms of the examples in -h metan-...

Mendis, A.S.J.

I have run a meta-analysis using METAN command on odds ration scale, and
the
used RET LIST to see the saved results. The output I got is as below.
 
It does not provide the pooled estimate of the effect size, tau squared,
SE
of log odds ratio, ect. which usually provided by STATA 9.2
 
Thanks
 
scalars:
               r(ymin) =  0
               r(ymax) =  8
               r(xmin) =  .0469176173210144
               r(xmax) =  1046.383911132813
                 r(ay) =  -2339.5
                 r(by) =  19771
                 r(ax) =  2544.230488395218
                 r(bx) =  13254.72217268045
macros:
               r(dbox) : "1055,5471,19771,30945,443,213,0"
               r(gbox) : "0,0,22376,32000,923,444,0"
This output is different to the one that I usually see in Intercooled
STATA
9.2

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index