[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
jverkuilen <jverkuilen@gc.cuny.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: GLLAMM multinomial: tremendous instability |

Date |
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:15:43 -0500 |

Initial reaction: Your model is either unidentified or very weakly identified and you are essentially at a "crease" in the log-likelihood manifold with a very slight peak. The different answers happen as you explore different regions of the crease. This is just a guess though. Are their predicted values similar? You may want to try smoothing a little. An easy way to do this is to add X observations that are uniformly distributed from the option set (or just distributed as per the univariate marginal for the options). Make X a relatively small proportion of the dataset, say 1% to 5% and be sure to move the number around to make sure the result is stable. This will shrink everything towards non-significance but that's the price you have to pay. I could be off-base so I look forward to hearing others' suggestions. -----Original Message----- From: "KONSTANTARAS KONSTANTINOS" <dinokon@otenet.gr> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: 11/24/2008 9:39 AM Subject: st: GLLAMM multinomial: tremendous instability Dear statalisters, In my model runs (using Intercooled Stata 9.2) I experience tremendous instability in gllamm results, higher than has been elsewhere reported at statalist: I run a simple multinomial logit model with random effects, using the results as initial matrix for exactly the same model, to get as a result an extremely different log likelihood and coefficients etc. The resulting loglikelihood differs by large margins (3-9%). I have also tried to use exactly the same initial values from mlogit but not only does the overall loglikelihood continues to be unstable but also the same happens with the loglikelihood obtained without random effects –running gllamm with init option-. Nevertheless the model invariably converges, albeit to an entirely different estimate. I have witnessed this instability in my initial model consisting of 8 covariates and three outcomes, hence, following the typical in relative cases recommendation from statalist to start “small” I have only used 1 explanatory variable, but instability remains –see for example the output below-. This problem, the way I read it, does not lie on the data set, as I get stable results from either mlogit -without random effects- or asmprobit -with random effects- converging steadily and nicely irrespective of starting matrix. By the way, asmprobit indicates existence of unobserved heterogeneity. Hence it’s not a multimodal maximum likelihood problem, or sparseness, because it would show up more intensely in MSL methods. Then what might the problem be? Any suggestions on how to go about it -because I would like to use the discrete Latent class unobserved heterogeneity capability of gllamm-? Thanks in advance for your time taken to assist me! Dino Konstantaras PS. I use panel data consisting of 390 highly unbalanced observations with gaps from 129 -level 1- units (id). Outliers (as detected by hadimvo routine) have been removed. My dependent categorical variable assumes 3 distinct values 1-3, 3 being the base reference with the highest frequency. My covariates consist of two binary and six continuous covariates –standardized- . The example below has been run with one continuous standardized covariate. The lower EPV (events per variable) in the run below is 30. * GLLAMM output * . gllamm alt fmt0 , expand(chosen patt m) l(mlogit) f(bin > om) adapt i(firm) nip(8) base(3) nrf(2) eqs(a1 a2) Running adaptive quadrature Iteration 0: log likelihood = -297.50547 … Iteration 5: log likelihood = -295.55745 Adaptive quadrature has converged, running Newton-Raphson Iteration 0: log likelihood = -295.55745 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -295.55744 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -295.55743 number of level 1 units = 1170 number of level 2 units = 129 Condition Number = 18.400152 gllamm model log likelihood = -295.55743 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ alt | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- c1 | fmt0 | 1.785588 2.034928 0.88 0.380 -2.202797 5.773973 _cons | .3614228 .2573106 1.40 0.160 -.1428968 .8657423 -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- c2 | fmt0 | 3.625611 1.826175 1.99 0.047 .0463731 7.204849 _cons | .3541614 .2666299 1.33 0.184 -.1684235 .8767463 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Variances and covariances of random effects ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ***level 2 (firm) var(1): .12708114 (.66898288) cov(2,1): .16044789 (.83246548) cor(2,1): 1 var(2): .2025755 (1.0658552) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . mat a0=e(b) . gllamm alt fmt0, expand(chosen patt m) l(mlogit) f(bin > om) adapt i(firm) nip(8) base(3) nrf(2) eqs(a1 a2) from(a0) Running adaptive quadrature Iteration 0: log likelihood = -293.33182 … Iteration 3: log likelihood = -288.31959 Adaptive quadrature has converged, running Newton-Raphson Iteration 0: log likelihood = -288.31959 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -288.31959 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -288.31958 number of level 1 units = 1170 number of level 2 units = 129 Condition Number = 17.167532 gllamm model log likelihood = -288.31958 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ alt | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- c1 | fmt0 | 5.718242 1.914655 2.99 0.003 1.965587 9.470898 _cons | .585764 .2601162 2.25 0.024 .0759457 [truncated by sender] * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: GLLAMM multinomial: tremendous instability** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: GLLAMM multinomial: tremendous instability** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: GLLAMM multinomial: tremendous instability** - Next by thread:
**st: -bandplot- available from SSC** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |