[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: significance of mean and median |

Date |
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:15:42 +0100 |

Line for the server... You probably wanted to say that "the CI did not overlap zero". Regarding the proper interpretation of statistical tests, you should consult any undergraduate statistics textbook. The 5% level means that your rejection of H0 will be wrong in 5% of the times you conduct this test. Note the parallels between -mean- and -ttest- ******* sysuse auto, clear replace mpg=mpg-20 ttest mpg=0 mean mpg ****** -ttest- output also gives you one-sided tests. Your question regarding whether you can conclude that the mean is negative is answered by the leftmost output of -ttest-. Regarding your -signtest-, do not try to reinvent the wheel. Stata provides a whole submenu of regression diagnostics which can be employed to discriminate between two competing models... HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bastian Steingros Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 3:02 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: RE: significance of mean and median Hi Martin, Using *mean* for several variables, stata has provided result like mean_var_x=-0.056 and the upper end of the CI did not overlap zero. Given a 95% CI, does the result indicate that the mean of var_x is negative at the 5% level (1% when used a 99% CI)? Is signtest not appropriate to compare the median inaccuracies of model 1 +2 or more generally to the medians of two variables? b -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:46:42 +0100 > Von: "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Betreff: st: RE: significance of mean and median > > Line for the server... > > On the second part, without judging the appropriateness of your procedure, > "(GDP_predicted - GDP)" looks like a straightforward residual to me, > available from -predict-, which would generate a new variable, ready to be > divided by "GDP" with -replace-. Afterwards -ttest- compares means and > -median- compares medians... > > HTH > Martin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bastian > Steingros > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 12:56 PM > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: st: significance of mean and median > > Hello everybody, > > I have this problem: > > After creating the descriptive statistics of my sample I want to show that > the mean of a certain variable is statistically significant. > For example the mean of var1 is 0,45. Now I want to show that the positive > sign is significant. > Is ttest the appropriate way to do so? > > Moreover, in another sample I want to predict the GDP using two different > regression models. > Finally, I want to compare the predicted values with the real GDP, that > is, > I will compare the mean and the median of the inaccuracy. > Inaccuracy is defined as (GDP_predicted - GDP)/GDP > > Is there a way to show that the median (mean) inaccuracies of the two > models > are statistically different from each other? > > may be *signtest*??? > > thanks > > bastian s > -- > Sensationsangebot nur bis 30.11: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL > für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Sensationsangebot nur bis 30.11: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: RE: st: RE: significance of mean and median***From:*"Bastian Steingros" <Steingros@gmx.de>

**References**:**st: significance of mean and median***From:*"Bastian Steingros" <Steingros@gmx.de>

**st: RE: significance of mean and median***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: RE: significance of mean and median***From:*"Bastian Steingros" <Steingros@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: significance of mean and median** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Three dimmensions panel data** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: significance of mean and median** - Next by thread:
**Re: RE: st: RE: significance of mean and median** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |