[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: -xi- and c(changed) [was: How to Export first-stage of IV (e.g. with ivreg2) to Latex (e.g. with outreg2) ?] |

Date |
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:25:50 -0000 |

I don't find it that weird. The longstanding point is that -xi:- will overwrite its products without your leave on the grounds that they are always deducible from the rest of your data and add no logical content. Easy come, easy go. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Martin Weiss On the occasion of this thread: Is it not weird that -c(changed)- does not reflect the fact that -xi- has created several new variables? *************** use http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/data/hayashi/griliches76.dta, replace xi i.year di c(changed) drop smsa80 di c(changed) *************** * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: How to Export first-stage of IV (e.g. with ivreg2) to Latex (e.g. with outreg2) ?***From:*Christoph Carl Basten <cc.basten@googlemail.com>

**st: -xi- and c(changed) [was: How to Export first-stage of IV (e.g. with ivreg2) to Latex (e.g. with outreg2) ?]***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Loop over variables with svyset** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Writing graphs to the log file** - Previous by thread:
**st: -xi- and c(changed) [was: How to Export first-stage of IV (e.g. with ivreg2) to Latex (e.g. with outreg2) ?]** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: How to Export first-stage of IV (e.g. with ivreg2) to Latex (e.g. with outreg2) ?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |