[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: Dirifit help |

Date |
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:52:18 -0000 |

I agree with Jay. In addition, what to do with rounded zeros (i.e. zero was observed, but not expected) in compositional data is covered, among other things, in this collection of papers from the Geological Society [the original one, not the later U.S. society]. I had some fun coding the recommended fudge-nudge methods up as Mata functions. Geosciences here indicates applications, not applicability. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk % --- lightly edited from GSL website Compositional Data Analysis in the Geosciences: From Theory to Practice Series: GSL Special Publications Ten Digit ISBN: 1-86239-205-6 Thirteen Digit ISBN: 978-1-86239-205-2 Author/Editor: Edited by A Buccianti, G Mateu-Figueras and V Pawlowsky-Glahn Publisher: Geological Society of London Publication Date: 16 October 2006 Binding: Hardback Pages: 224 Weight: 0.83kg £75.00 List price Description Since Karl Pearson wrote his paper on spurious correlation in 1897, a lot has been said about the statistical analysis of compositional data, mainly by geologists such as Felix Chayes. The solution appeared in the 1980s, when John Aitchison proposed to use logratios. Since then, the approach has seen a great expansion, mainly building on the idea of the 'natural geometry' of the sample space. Statistics is expected to give sense to our perception of the natural scale of the data, and this is made possible for compositional data using logratios. This publication will be a milestone in this process. This book will be of interest to geologists using statistical methods. It includes the intuitive justification of the methodology, convincing through case studies and presenting user-friendly software, which includes a section for those who need to see the proof of the mathematical consistency of the methods used. Contents Compositional data and their analysis: an introduction, V Pawlowsky-Glahn and J J Egozcue * Applications to the solution of real geological problems * Major-oxide compositional discrimination in Cenozoic volcanites of Hungary, L Ó Kovács, G P Kovács, J A Martín-Fernández and C Barceló-Vidal * Log-ratios and geochemical discrimination of Scottish Dalradian limestones: a case study, C W Thomas and J Aitchison * Discriminating geodynamical regimes of tin ore formation using trace element composition of cassiterite: the Sikhote'Alin case (Far Eastern Russia), N Gorelikova, R Tolosana-Delgado, V Pawlowsky-Glahn, A Khanchuk and V Gonevchuk * On stability of compositional canonical variate vector components, R A Reyment * Compositional changes in a fumarolic field, Vulcano Island, Italy: a statistical case study, A Buccianti, F Tassi and O Vaselli * Ternary sandstone composition and provenance: an evaluation of the 'Dickinson model', G J Weltje * Software and related issues * Detailed guide of CoDaPack: a freeware compositional software, S Thió-Henestrosa and J A Martín-Fernández * Compositional data analysis with 'R' and the package 'compositions', K G van der Boogaart and R Tolosana-Delgado * Visualization of three- and four- part (sub)compositions with 'R', M Bren and V Batagelj * General theory and methods * Simplicial geometry for compositional data, J J Egozcue and V Pawlowsky-Glahn * Exploratory compositional data analysis, J Daunis-i-Estadella, C Barceló-Vidal and A Buccianti * Frequency distributions and natural laws in geochemistry, A Buccianti, G Mateu-Figueras and V Pawlowsky-Glahn * Rounded zeros: some practical aspects for compositional data, J A Martìn-Fernandez and S Thió-Henestrosa * Is the simplex open or closed? (some topological concepts), E Barrabés and G Mateu-Figueras Reviews In conclusion, I highly recommend this very useful book to any geologist (or indeed any scientist) interested in how log-ratio methods can facilitate better statistical analysis Published online: 26 October 2007 Springer-Verlag 2007 Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess (2008) 22:139-141 This review was submitted by: John Bacon-Shone 21 July 2008 This book will be valuable for geoscientists and the statisticians who advise them. Review featured in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Vol 171, Part 1, 2008 This review was submitted by: R.M. Lark, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden 25 July 2008 % end of stuff from GSL website jverkuilen You really need to read the Aitchison book Maarten cited. Get the 2003 edition, which has an extra chapter in the back. How well a model like -dirifit- or the logistic-normal that Aitchison prefers can cope with boundaries is tricky. Much depends on the meaning of the zero or one observation. If it is due to rounding error, the procedure recommended by Aitchison is to shrink everything into the simplex uniformly by a small amount, eps. This turns out to work quite well and does very little damage to your estimates, though if you are not caeful Aitchison's model will end up with outliers if you pick a bad value of eps. If it represents something qualitatively different than an observation of eps > 0, you have a bigger problem. From: "Murali Kuchibhotla" <muralik@iastate.edu> Thank you Maarten. It turns out that the dependent variables that I am trying to model(which are in the nature of proportions) take values which include 0 and 1. So dirifit seems inappropriate for this particular application. In your presentation however, you show that the fractional logit model can handle this constraint for the single dependent variable case. Does this also hold when modelling multiple dependent variables? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**RE: st: Dirifit help***From:*jverkuilen <jverkuilen@gc.cuny.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: Dirifit help** - Next by Date:
**st: re: how to quietly svmat?** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Dirifit help** - Next by thread:
**st: Is a data set with size 296,242,984 too big for stata to analyze?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |