[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: insheet delimiter problem |

Date |
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:41:05 -0000 |

My point was not that you were advocating overwriting but that it might be thought that I was... And yes, I agree: Simplicity can be in the eye of the beholder. I was thinking largely of brevity, you, it seems, largely of the familiarity of commands you know well. But -split- might be a strange command to some. On -hexdump-: I don't think it's quite as difficult as you imply. For example, with "@" as a candidate, you just need to use the -results- option and check e.g. that r(c64) == 0. All amicably, of course, Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Joseph Coveney Nick Cox wrote: I would never recommend alteration of the original data file. I would always recommend that you work on a copy. With that proviso, this route is more complicated than using -filefilter-. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- Lest there be a misunderstanding: I wasn't advocating overwriting an original data file (or even a working copy) with -filefilter-. I don't know about analogous Unix commands, but have to assume that they, too, have infile=, outfile= among their parameter lists. We'll have to agree to disagree about relative complexity. Amicably, I hope. I just find stopping to manually parse through -hexdump , tabulate- output hoping that I don't overlook successive members of a list of candidate substitutes, and then setting up -filefilter- with the winner, and then -insheet-ing the outfile, to be a similarly complicated prospect. Maybe it's the inherent error-proneness of manually processing parallel lists looking for things that aren't supposed to be there in one of them that bothered me. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: insheet delimiter problem***From:*"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: using drawnorm and by()??** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Chi-square test with probabilities** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: insheet delimiter problem** - Next by thread:
**st: Manipulation of the distribution** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |