[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steven Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: adjusted R2 in survey regression |

Date |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:44:22 -0400 |

-Steve On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Stas Kolenikov wrote:

If Stata does not produce something really obvious, like R2 or adjusted R2, then it means they looked into this and decided it had dubious statistical properties.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Aca N.T. <acant29@gmail.com> wrote:I'm puzzled with model building using -svy: reg- for there is no adjusted R squared produced. Is there an alternative test for this?

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: adjusted R2 in survey regression***From:*"Aca N.T." <acant29@gmail.com>

**Re: st: adjusted R2 in survey regression***From:*"Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: question on xtile using cutpoints** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: question on xtile using cutpoints** - Previous by thread:
**Re: model building survey data. WAS st: adjusted R2 in survey regression** - Next by thread:
**st: examples propensity score matching** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |