Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: adjusted R2 in survey regression


From   Steven Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: adjusted R2 in survey regression
Date   Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:44:22 -0400

Stas's post led me to go back and check what -svy: reg- does produce, something I should have done earlier. -svy: reg- does display an R- Squared and it is the "really obvious" one, the adjusted R-Squared.

-Steve

On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Stas Kolenikov wrote:

If Stata does not produce something really obvious, like R2 or
adjusted R2, then it means they looked into this and decided it had
dubious statistical properties.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Aca N.T. <acant29@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm puzzled with model building using -svy: reg- for there is no
adjusted R squared produced.
Is there an alternative test for this?


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index