Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: endogenous interaction term


From   "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: endogenous interaction term
Date   Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:59:08 -0400

Gordon <gordon.stat@yahoo.com>:
See e.g.
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-08/msg00780.html
With multiple instruments and multiple endog vars, you may want to use
LIML so -ivreg2- will give you a little more room to pass the weak ID
tests of Stock and Yogo (see the help file for -ivreg2-, on SSC) since
LIML is slightly more robust to multiple weak instruments.

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Gordon Gordon <gordon.stat@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to estimate the following equation:
>
> Y = b0+ b1*X1 +b2* X2 + b3*X1*X2
>
> X1 is a dummy variable and endogenous, X2 is exogenous and normalized.
>
> If there are no interaction term, I can apply either IV or Heckman two stage to correct the endogeneity of X1.
>
> However with the interaction term of X1*X2, I do not know how to deal with it.
>
> Any advice is much appreciated!
>
> Gordon
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index