[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Clive Nicholas" <clivelists@googlemail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Basic regression interaction term question |

Date |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:17:23 +0100 |

Michael I. Lichter wrote: > This is a pretty basic question, but I haven't been able to find any > examples in the lit with this particular configuration ... > > Suppose you regress Y on A and B, and you expect an interaction between A > and B. > > In the regression Y = A + B, the coefficient for B is not significant, but > you have reason to think that it will be significant once you introduce the > interaction term. > > However, in the regression Y = A + B + AB, the coefficient for B remains > non-significant even though the coefficient for AB is significant. Yet, > "test A B AB" is significant. > > Is it reasonable to treat this as a significant interaction? > > What if AB is not significant either but "test A B AB" is still significant? Woe betide anyone who dismisses any of Nick's flags on this list (!), but I'm firmly with John on this one. As far as 'experts' working in the fields of political science and political methodology are concerned, this debate is all over bar the shouting. Including first-order terms in an interaction model is no longer a nice-looking optional extra. What's important to remember here is that you only include the first-order terms because: (1) their exclusion would assume that they equal 0: which is almost never the case; and (2) it allows you to get as precise a parameter estimate as possible on the interaction term. Braumoller (2004) - a member of this list - and Brambor et al (2006) make these points and explain in detail what they consider to be good practice in this area, at least from a social science perspective. -- Clive Nicholas [Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at <clivenicholas@hotmail.com>. Please respond to contributions I make in a list thread here. Thanks!] Brambor T, Clark WC and Golder M (2006) "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses", Political Analysis 14(1): 63-82. Braumoeller BF (2004) "Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms," International Organization 58(4): 807-820. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Basic regression interaction term question***From:*John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>

**References**:**st: Basic regression interaction term question***From:*"Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: Confidence Interval vs Confidence in Judgement** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Syntax of -webuse-** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Basic regression interaction term question** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Basic regression interaction term question** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |