[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Eva Poen" <eva.poen@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable |

Date |
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:38:52 +0100 |

Not only -summarize-, but most statistical commands leave their results behind. Just type -return list- after any command such as -centile-, -ci-, -pwcorr-, -correlate-, -ttest-, -tabulate- etc. to see what is there. For estimation commands, it's -ereturn list- and results will be store in e(). Same principle. Note also the availability of scalars (-help scalar-) which can save numbers in higher precision than local macros. Eva 2008/10/3 Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>: > Anything that -su-, possibly with the -detail-, option throws up can be > strored this way. > > r(N) > r(sum_w) > r(mean) > r(Var) > r(sd) > r(skewness) > r(kurtosis) > r(sum) > r(min) > r(max) > r(p1) > r(p5) > r(p10) > r(p25) > r(p50) > r(p75) > r(p90) > r(p95) > r(p99) > > > Apart from that, also note commands like -collapse-... > > BTW, what is the second mode? > > HTH > Martin > _______________________ > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com> > To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 6:21 PM > Subject: Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable > > >> Yes I see that. Quite clever. BUT what if it is something which is NOT >> generated by a summary statistic . Like say the 2nd mode ( assuming a >> variable has 2 modes). Can I directly store it into a local variable ? >> >> Thank you, >> Ashim. >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote: >>> >>> As we said this morning: >>> >>> su age,mean >>> loc lj=r(max) >>> >>> HTH >>> Martin _______________________ >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com> >>> To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> >>> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 5:54 PM >>> Subject: st: saving memory local vs usual variable >>> >>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> I have a question. Suppose I have a variable say - > age. Now I can do >>>> egen j=max(age). Then I will have the max value of age in ONE >>>> VARIABLE! Horrible waste of memory. I try to do local lj=max(age) and >>>> that does not work. How can I conserve memory ? Is there something >>>> basic which I have missed ? >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Ashim. >>>> >>>> PS : I do understand that I can do egen j = max (age ) and then say >>>> local lj=j[1] and then -do drop j - but is there a better way ? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

**st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: macro & file name** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |