Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Best laptop specifications to run version 9.0 and 10


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: Best laptop specifications to run version 9.0 and 10
Date   Thu, 2 Oct 2008 23:37:43 +0200

What`s your secret then?

HTH
Martin
_______________________
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rafal Raciborski" <rraciborski@gmail.com>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: st: Best laptop specifications to run version 9.0 and 10



i have a year old hp laptop with vista business and 2g ram and never
had problem setting memory to 1400m



On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote:
My laptop runs Vista Ultimate 32bit with 3G of Ram. I used to be able to
-set mem 1000m-, sometimes, when I got lucky, 1100m. Then, after a few
months, it went downhill dramatically. Now I never make it past 500m. Bottom
line: big jobs in Stata belong on a desktop computer, preferably with a
64bit OS (and 64bit Stata)...

HTH
Martin
_______________________
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lachenbruch, Peter"
<Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:22 PM
Subject: RE: st: Best laptop specifications to run version 9.0 and 10



I just got a new computer with Vista (Business) on it.  I had some
problems installing Stata 10 on the machine - partly there were
incompatibilities with the operating system, but a call to tech-support
got it fixed.  The other part of the problems were caused by my
inverting two letters in the code to unlock Stata - I'd like to blame
someone else, but I can't.  Anyway, huge compliments to Kevin Crow of
Stata

Tony

Peter A. Lachenbruch
Department of Public Health
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone: 541-737-3832
FAX: 541-737-4001


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of David Kantor
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:51 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: Best laptop specifications to run version 9.0 and 10

At 03:45 PM 10/2/2008, Adrian wrote:
[...]

I want to know what are the best specifications for a laptop in
order to run Stata with a big dataset, that keeps growing.  I am not
doing a lot of statistical simualtions, but from time to time need
to run some marginal effects for logits/ probits and when I RESHAPE
some of the databases, it takes over 20 minutes in my current laptop
(over 3 years old).

One of the main issues i am facing in my current laptop, is that if
keeping other applications running (excel, or outlook) makes stata
to fail to save files back in my hardisk

Laptop is important because I telecomute and mobility is a plus.  I
guess the question can be framed as what is more important RAM
versus proccessor speed?  Or AMD versus Intel processors?  Speed of
hard disk?
is there any other configuration specification that I am overlooking?

I you have bought a new laptop recently to run stata, i appreciate
if you can let me know the particular specs and budget

thanks

Adrian
Let me step around your question. When you experience these episodes
of slow performance, you might be using virtual memory. If so, then a
memory upgrade may be what you need, rather than a whole new
computer. Generally a memory upgrade can significantly improve
performance in many situations, and is much more economical than
getting a new computer.

You said that the presence of other applications causes Stata to fail
to do certain things. That shouldn't happen; it might slow thing down
to a crawl, but it shouldn't cause any other effects within Stata. If
that's really happening, I'd call it an operating system problem.

On the other hand, when I need to use large amount of memory, I'm
inclined to close down all those other applications (and run only one
instance of Stata) -- to avoid those problems.

If you do get a new computer, and if you run procedures that involve
a lot of temp files (e.g., -reshape-), then you may want to go for a
fast hard drive.

If you do get a new computer, and it's a PC, you may be forced into
getting Vista, which some people find to be a disadvantage. That's a
whole other story.

HTH
--David

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index