[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"b. water" <barleywater@hotmail.com> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: graph bar and/or catplot |

Date |
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:39:55 +0000 |

nick (cox), to be sure 'c'est la vie' didn't mean giving up. intuitively i thought so too that the problem can't be that difficult having used your catplot in the past. at the moment though i am not making any headway. i have a feeling that i need to manipulate the data into something else first before applying the appropriate [G]raph command to produce the graph that i wanted (like so below) but what that something else first is i am stumped (or that the data set-up need to re-organized in a different): ^ no. of + returns 80+ xx + xx xx cc xx cc 60+ xx cc xx cc xx cc + xx cc xx xx cc xx cc + xx cc xx cc xx cc xx cc + xx cc xx cc xx cc xx cc + xx cc xx cc xx cc xx cc +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++> 1 2 3 4 5 xx = laser1 cc = laser2 xx and cc are my 'cartoon-ish' substitute for a bar histogram for laser 1 and 2 respectively. there is also a category of responds i.e. equal to 5 which none of the subjects returns in evaluating laser1 or laser2 hence will be zero on the histogram as seen above. i am not sure how much of the above illustration describes what i wanted better than words can but i hope it does. if further description in words is required please do let me know. as requested, the contigency table is as follows: .tab laser1 laser2 laser2 laser1 1 2 3 4 Total 1 70 65 22 8 165 2 64 29 13 0 106 3 20 8 2 0 30 4 11 3 1 0 15 Total 165 105 38 8 316 once again thank you for your (or anyone else's) input. regards, bw > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:20:54 -0500 > From: n.j.cox@stata.com > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: st: graph bar and/or catplot > > The original question talked about a bar graph from two categorical > variables. > > The problem can't be too difficult! Odds are that it yields to an > existing command. If it doesn't we'll write one. > > Instead of "c'est la vie", how about a restatement of the problem? > > Show us > > 1. The contingency table -tab laser1 laser2-. > > 2. A word description of what you want. > > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > b. water wrote: > >> i still could not create the graphs that i wanted to create. perhaps it is a case of c'est la vie. i'll try a little bit more with gr bar and catplot. if i manage to create the graphs that i wanted, i'll post the commands to the list. > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ _________________________________________________________________ Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie. http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: graph bar and/or catplot***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: zoom in on a Kaplan-Meier plot (display only a subset of the time axis)** - Next by Date:
**st: Standardized tobit coefficients** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Test for trend in surveys** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: graph bar and/or catplot** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |