[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: testing for endogeneity with cluster()

From   "Schaffer, Mark E" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: RE: testing for endogeneity with cluster()
Date   Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:48:42 +0100


> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> [] On Behalf Of 
> ritashree chakrabarti
> Sent: 24 September 2008 17:14
> To:
> Subject: st: testing for endogeneity with cluster()
> Hi,
> I am doing IV regressions and using the "ivreg2" command. I want to
> test for endogeneity and therefore using the "ivendog" to get the
> Durbin-Wu-Hausman test statistic after conducting the IV regressions.
> However, I want to report results with robust standard errors obtained
> after clustering. Since this test is based on the assumption that all
> the observations are independent; the assumption will no longer be
> valid when I pecify "cluster()" and, therefore, the test produced by
> -ivendog- is not valid in those cases, right.
> My question is how to test for endogeneity when I am using the
> "cluster()" with ivreg2?

If you are using the latest version of -ivreg2-, just use the -endog()-
option.  There is a clickable example at the bottom of the -ivreg2- help

> Also to test for the validity of instruments after clustering I should
> be comparing the Hansen J-statistic reported automatically when I run
> "ivreg2" with the cluster option.

I think the short answer is "yes".

Best wishes,

> I am concerned whether I am taking
> the right steps and interpreting the results correctly.
> I would really appreciate your help.
> Thanks.
> Ritashree.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index