[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Divya Balasubramaniam <divya@uga.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: When number of regressors greaterthan the number of clusters in OLS regression |

Date |
Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:09:05 -0400 (EDT) |

Hello Dr. Steven, I chose the states based on availability of data. Yes, all the districts are part of the 17 states only. Any other suggestions will really help. Thanks, Divya. ======================================= Divya Balasubramaniam Economics PhD Student Terry College of Business University of Georgia Athens -30602.

---Begin Message---More basic questions, Divya: What is your target population: the 17 states (of India, perhaps?) or the entire country? Were the 17 states selected from all states by a sampling process? Or were they chosen in some other way--for example, because they had data available. Are all districts from the selected states in your sample?

FromSteven Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net> Tostatalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu SubjectRe: st: When number of regressors greater than the number of clusters in OLS regression DateMon, 1 Sep 2008 13:05:39 -0400

-Steven

On Sep 1, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Divya Balasubramaniam wrote:

Dear Dr.Schaffer,

I am using clustering in my analysis and I am having some trouble understanding some of the important issues. I have read several papers you have written on clustering issues and hence I am emailing you to seek help.

I am doing a district level analysis for the census year 2001. I have 436 districts in total coming from 17 States. I run an OLS regression of Share of households having tap water access on several controls variables (I have about 25 Regressors). I use the STATA command areg Y on X, absorb(State) cluster(state). I have the state fixed effects and clustered by State.

My question is: I have more regresors(25) than the number of clusters(17). I also find in the STATA output that I have F-stat missing. I would like to seek your advice on whether I can make inference by looking at the individual coefficient estimates and the reported robust Standard errors. I did see your comment on this issue on the STATA listserv. However, I could not find answers as to how to fix this problem of having more regressors than the number of clusters.

I will be extremely thankful if you can kindly help me in this regard.

Sincerely,

Divya.

=======================================

Divya Balasubramaniam

Economics PhD Student

Terry College of Business

University of Georgia

Athens -30602.

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/---End Message---

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: When number of regressors greater than the number of clusters in OLS regression***From:*Steven Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: When number of regressors greater than the number of clusters in OLS regression** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: When number of regressors greaterthan the number of clusters in OLS regression** - Previous by thread:
**st: When number of regressors greater than thenumber of clusters in OLS regression** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: When number of regressors greater than the number of clusters in OLS regression** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |