[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Maurizio Pisati <maurizio.pisati@unimib.it> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: -spmap- reason for no aspect() option? |

Date |
Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:26:19 +0200 |

Dear Dan,

the reason why option -aspect()- is preset in -spmap- is exactly that outlined by Sergiy. However, as Scott has correctly pointed out, by specifying option -freestyle- (introduced in the latest version of -spmap) you can gain control over most of the -graph twoway- options. Quoting from the -spmap- help file:

freestyle requests that, when drawing the graph, all the formatting presets and restrictions built in spmap be

ignored. By default, spmap presets the values of some graph options and restricts the use of some others,

so as to produce a "nice" graph automatically. By specifying option freestyle, the user loses this feature but

gains full control over most of the graph formatting options.

Best wishes,

Maurizio

At 03.58 27/08/2008, you wrote:

Hello Dan, 1. Correct me if I am wrong, but the most probable reason that aspect() option is not implemented is the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_projection E.g. Americans commonly use Mercator, while Russians prefer Albers projection. The difference can be very large and depends on the distance from the equator. The transformation between most (all?) projection pairs is non-linear and can't be implemented as stretching/squeezing maps. -spmap- (and -tmap-) were developed for GIS graphs in Stata.

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: -spmap- reason for no aspect() option?***From:*"Dan Weitzenfeld" <dan.weitzenfeld@emsense.com>

**Re: st: -spmap- reason for no aspect() option?***From:*"Sergiy Radyakin" <serjradyakin@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: problem creating and doing a foreach on a local of all numeric variables in a dataset** - Next by Date:
**st: A query on reading all files in this current directory.** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: -spmap- reason for no aspect() option?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: -spmap- reason for no aspect() option?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |